With the rise of crowdsourcing sites like TripAdvisor and Yelp, more and more people are writing reviews of everything from electronics to bean curds, and everyone is a critic. But how do you know whether a review is any good? Presented here are reviews of reviews, by a critic of critics. You will want to read the original review first.
Subscribe to the RSS feed to be notified of updates.
One long review of six short reviews that were probably also written by one guy.
A mature assessment of a juvenile veneration of a movie for children.
Talking man-to-man about a show by and for women.
An accurate assessment of an error-riddled review of Guillermo del Toro's latest film.
A far-too-long review of four far-too-short reviews of shows coming to the Vancouver Fringe.
A blog post with two reviews of an article with three reviews of shows at the Edmonton Fringe.
A five star review of a five star review of "one of the funniest performances at this year's Fringe."
A review that shouldn't be of something that should be a review but isn't.
A Gen-Xer explains a Baby Boomer's misunderstanding of something Millennials are into.
An exposé on a writer's obsession with Andy Kindler's obsession with Ricky Gervais.
A well-reasoned one-star review of a bizarrely justified three-star review of a show at the Winnipeg Fringe.
A pseudo-comedic critique of a pseudo-intellectual critique of The Big Sick.
Intentionally missing the point of a review that unintentionally misses the point of Rory Scovel Tries Stand-up For The First Time.
One man's opinion of one woman's opinion of Norm Macdonald.
The very first review review, which spawned this whole dumb enterprise.